When you have to sell a product, you will take whatever measures needed to make sure that advertising is memorable and makes sales. If your product is mediocre, then you really have to do what you can to ensure that people will buy your product. If you can’t sell the product using television ads or put in any more money to make sure that your product is of the highest quality, then you need to do what you can to sell it. Yes, it may end up making many people mad, and could end up in some returns, but you’ll count on the fact that most people don’t want to bother with the hassle.
What is described here is the trend of false advertising. False advertising can range from “bait and switch” to completely lying about what product is inside the package. While it is extremely risky to conduct business in that matter, there is sure to be trouble and public humiliation on the internet. When the customer sees what’s on the box, they expect to receive the product that’s on the box. The same goes for dating profiles, when a suitor is trying to find a date, and they will portray themselves in a certain light so that they are more appealing. In this video are ten hilarious examples of false advertising. Whether it is receiving a completely different product, or the ad portrays something too big but it’s really too small, these advertisements don’t portray the real deal.
Companies will do whatever it takes to land a sale, even if it means stretching the truth about the quality of their product. From toys arriving too small to getting a completely different product, here are 10 hilarious examples of false advertising.
American ad agencies routinely use hidden business arrangements to boost profits without their clients’ knowledge, according to an explosive new report from the Association of National Advertisers.
The report says that these undisclosed dealings, such as rebates awarded by media companies based on how much agencies spend or pressure to do business with agencies linked to a parent company, are “pervasive” across the U.S. media-buying industry.
For the brands buying the advertising, the concern is that these secret incentives might cause agencies to spend their money in a way that puts the agency’s own best interests before that of their clients.
That’s whythe ANA, a marketing trade group that represents big global brands like Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, General Motors and AT&T, has an interest in uncovering these practices.
A research firm called K2 Intelligence prepared the report on the group’s behalf based on interviews with 150 anonymous sources. Of the 117 of those sources with a direct role in the media buying process, 59 said they had been involved in undisclosed dealings of this sort in at least one instance.
The highly-anticipated release stirred up plenty of debate across the industry on Tuesday. Though the report avoided naming any individual agencies or cases for the sake of protecting anonymous sources, several agencies and their holding companies lashed out at its findings in statements.
“A healthy and constructive debate about media buying can only happen with a bipartisan, engaged, industry-wide approach and that is precisely the opposite of what the ANA has pursued,” a spokesperson for the American Association of Advertising Agencies said in a statement that captured the sentiment among many of the agencies responding.
“We call upon the ANA in the strongest terms to make available to specific agencies on a confidential basis all of the materials related to them,” the statement continued.
At the very least, brand marketers are likely to come away from the report with some questions for the agencies that spend money on their behalf. Agencies will in turn have to reassure them that they are not doing anything unethical.
When brand marketers at corporations like McDonald’s or Ford want to buy a television commercial, magazine spread, billboard, online banner or any other type of ad, they usually turn to an agency or an agency division that specializes in buying media space.
As part of this transaction, they expect these agencies to buy whatever slots are needed to meet their demands at the best possible price for the client. They also expect agencies to be transparent about how they go about it.
According to the report, however, many of the media suppliers selling the advertising space regularly offer to pay the buyers rebates of anywhere between 1.7% to around 20% of their spending if they agree to take a certain amount of their total business to them.
Sometimes these rebates are paid in cash or free ad space; other times in the form of cheaper rates for services like consulting or research. But the report found that these services were oftentimes “of minimal utility, significantly overpriced or not provided at all.”
Media buying agencies generally work on behalf of a roster of different brands. So when one buyer gives preferential treatment to any one supplier, there’s a chance it could serve its own bottom line which is rooted in the aggregate interests of all of its clients but not necessarily that of any of its individual clients.
Advertising rebates and other such bonuses are common practice in Europe and much of the rest of the world, according to varioussurveys, but U.S. ad execs have claimed for years that they aren’t used here.
An industry of empires
The advertising industry has consolidated at an accelerating pace in recent years to better compete with deep-pocketed tech giants like Facebook and Google.
As a result, the industry is currently dominated by six big holding companies: WPP, Omnicom, Publicis Groupe, Interpublic, Dentsu and Havas. Together, they control nearly half of the world’s $6 billion ad market.
Each of those companies owns dozens of agencies that operate at every conceivable level of the advertising supply chain. Those resources allow them make the case to shareholders and clients that they can meet all of a brand’s advertising needs within the same company.
But the probe also pointed to some conflicts of interests that come with having so many tentacles.
For instance, the report alleges, some holding companies will buy media at one rate, hike the price by anywhere between approximately 30% and 90%, then resell it to clients through another agency without ever disclosing the original cost. Essentially, they act as their own suppliers.
Media buyers are also reportedly pressured or incentivized to buy through these in-house channels, even if doing so is not in the client’s best interest. In other instances, agencies might have an undisclosed stake or an advisory role at a media supplier.
These hidden business practices aren’t just limited to big holding companies though; evidence of such dealings was also found at small independent agencies and across all types of media.
As noted above, ad agencies have responded to these findings with anger, arguing that accusations should have been made on an individual basis or as a collaborative effort as to not condemn the entire industry.
“We believe that the key findings neither quantified nor qualified, and based on a small sampling of unnamed sources do not accurately portray how Omnicom’s agencies work on behalf of our clients,” an Omnicom spokesperson said in a pre-emptive statement. “In so doing, it does not serve the best interests of the clients that the ANA purports to represent.”
Accusations of corruption in the advertising industry aren’t entirely new, and some have argued that they are becoming a problem in attracting talent.
Marco Bertozzi, global chief revenue officer at Performics and formerly of Publicis’ Starcom MediaVest Group, wrote in a blog postpublished days before the report was released that “blanket accusations” make it hard for the “kids who are working their socks off” and tarnish the industry’s image when it’s already struggling to lure new workers.
Pivotal Research analyst Brian Wieser factored in early reports of the ANA probe to his somewhat muted growth forecast for the holding company stocks earlier this year.
Brand marketers, meanwhile have been predictably more receptive to the investigation’s findings.
P&G said it relies on regular audits to root out any transparency failings on the part of its agency relationships.
“We have a ‘trust but verify’ approach that includes having clear and thorough stipulations in our contracts, regular audits on performance, and third party verification that ensures transparency,” a company spokesperson said in a statement. “If we find irregularities, we will take remedial action.”
Most reactions in the corporate marketing world seemed to focus on assessing the findings in terms of their own business relationships.
“Trust and transparency are critical to any relationship, so we take the ANAs findings very seriously,” a Unilever spokesperson said in a statemtent. “At Unilever, we are actively engaged with our agencies and the industry at large to exert greater control and responsibility around media transparency.”
The full impact may not be felt until the investigation’s findings have more time to reverberate the industry.
Have something to add to this story? Share it in the comments.
Print Advertising Is Not Dead
Print advertising isn’t dead. Despite statistics supporting the ever impending total movement to digital marketing, print media is developing a new and creative relevance in marketing communications. Nostalgia has taken hold of European culture, vinyl … Read more on Branding Magazine (subscription)
Attorney General settles with motor vehicle advertiser and issues motor …
The Vermont Attorney General’s Office entered into an Assurance of Discontinuance with Aspen Marketing Services, LLC after the Attorney General’s investigation revealed that over 81,000 letters Aspen sent on behalf of five GM motor vehicle dealers … Read more on vtdigger.org
An AOL-owned company says it can now send advertisements to users’ smartphones based on the television commercials they watch. The new technology, offered by A Media, extracts data from set-top boxes and anonymously matches it with the viewer’s smartphone. Read The Entire Story (Fast Company)
State AG Launches Inquiry into Advertising of Internet Speeds
Three major internet service providers are having to answer questions from the State Attorney General’s office about accusations of falsely advertising internet speeds. NY1’s parent company Time Warner Cable, along with Verizon and Cablevision, have … Read more on NY1
Why Starbucks Chose to Forego Traditional Advertising for So Long
AND…most of the ads you’ve seen featuring Starbucks have been done by partners like Kraft and Pepsi promoting Starbucks ice cream, bottled Frappuccino, whole beans, not ads for the stores. CEO of Starbucks Howard Schultz always said, “our stores are … Read more on Observer
Ad execs say Facebook is the most effective for social advertising
As the social media channel that has caused marketers the most headaches over the last several years, it seems Facebook is making up for it by providing advertisers with what eMarketer principal analyst Debra Aho Williamson called “an extremely … Read more on The American Genius
Over the years there probably have been millions of ad campaigns produced. As consumers this many campaigns leads to “information overload.” It’s tough it cut through the clutter in the marketing world.
I like the website imediaconnection.com and they content they provide. I like the recent by Jeff Ferguson, CEO, Fang Digital Marketing who speculated what an ad agency will look like in 2020. If you have been on the client side, agency or both, you might appreciate this article.
Marketers/advertisers usually focus their efforts on the people responsible for making the purchase. In many cases, this is an effective approach but in other cases it can make for a totally useless marketing campaign.
Virgin Mobile took a more effective approach in marketing their cell phone service by focusing not on the people that would be making the actual purchase, but instead focusing on the influencers of the people making the purchase. To make this campaign work, Virgin developed a viral website called which offers many tips (often fairy funny ones) to convince their parents to purchase a Virgin Mobile phone for them. By enlisting the teenagers Virgin has multiplied the effectiveness of their marketing campaign for 3 reasons:
1. The teenagers will continually mention the phone/service to their parents until they get it – Virgin’s campaign will continue to work long after the teenager has left the computer.
2. This approach is exactly the type of thing that spreads virally. As teenagers tell their friends about it, it will increase exponentially in it’s effectiveness.
3. They have targeted the most likely decision maker rather than the person responsible for the purchase.
Companies in other industries have take the same approach and achieved amazing results. For example, Pfizer targeted men with erectile disfunction (a more PC term for impotence) rather than the doctors who would actually prescribe the drug (Viagra) to treat it. You can take the same approach to market your product/service and reap tremendous rewards.